One of the most important factors to consider when analyzing and comparing ETF investment options is the expenses of the fund. The ETF arena now has so many investment options, that many areas in the market have become over-represented as more and more issuers come out with very similar looking ETFs competing solely on the basis of price. Comparing costs within actively-managed ETFs is just as important as it would be for index ETFs.

The overall average expense ratio for actively-managed ETFs in the US is 0.67%. Naturally, this is higher than the average you would see for passive ETFs. Digging deeper into specific asset classes, important differences start becoming clearer. The average expenses for active equity ETFs come in at 0.89%, for active fixed-income ETFs at 0.34% and for active currency ETFs at 0.44%. We delve deeper into the details of what investors should look out for when analyzing expenses for actively-managed ETFs.

Breaking Down Active ETF Expenses

You can find a detailed break-down of the expenses for an Active ETF in its prospectus. You can most likely find the relevant disclosure on the fund’s website as well, but the most detailed version is probably in the prospectus and you can usually find this in the first few pages. Below is a snapshot of what the typical expense disclosure looks like:

1. Shareholder Fees

Most disclosures start off with something called the “Shareholder Fees”. When looking at funds in general, this component consists of a sales charge imposed on purchases that gets taken out from your initial investment and the second component is the transaction fees on purchases or redemptions. In the mutual fund world, many funds do charge a sales load anywhere from 0%-5%, but in the ETF world, such loads are nearly non-existent. The other component, transaction fees, is what you would pay your broker in trading commissions which vary from broker to broker. As such, most ETFs list “Shareholder Fees” listed as zero.

2. Management Fees

The biggest component of the expense structure for ETFs is usually the management fee. This is the fee that gets paid to the manager of the fund who makes the investment decisions for the fund on a day-to-day basis. This is the component that differentiates actively-managed ETF from passive ETFs because management fee for active management, as you would expect, is higher than that for passive management.

3. Distribution Fees

The distribution fees or the “12b-1” fees is another item that is more relevant for mutual funds than for ETFs. 12b-1 fees for mutual funds are paid by the fund out of fund assets to cover distribution expenses and sometimes shareholder service expenses. Essentially, this fee is used to compensate intermediaries for selling the fund’s shares. In fact, these fees have come under heavy debate of late as the SEC voted to scrap 12b-1 fees all together for mutual funds. Most Active ETFs, do not charge any distribution fees. If you read deep into the footnotes, you’ll see that these ETFs are actually allowed to bear a 12b-1 fee not exceeding 0.25% of the fund’s assets, but the ETFs don’t usually charge these fees. Hence, this is another line item that will list a zero expense nearly all the time.

4. Other Expenses

This line item is a catch-all for the remaining expense items that are usually too small to be listed individually. These include expenses such as the custodian fees, recordkeeping fees, unit-holder communication costs, legal and audit fees, as well as listing fees. Of course, not all of those fees may apply to all funds.

The “other expenses” vary in size from fund to fund. For example, for the One Fund (NYSE:ONEF), the other expenses are less than 0.01% but for the Grail McDonnell Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (NYSE:GMMB), the other expenses are 0.28%.

5. Acquired Fund Fees And Expenses

The acquired fund fees are especially relevant for actively-managed ETFs because many Active ETFs have adopted a fund-of-funds structure. This means that they can implement their investment strategy by choosing to invest in other ETFs instead of individual securities. This also means that the fund will have to pay the expenses of the underlying ETFs. For example, the Dent Tactical ETF (NYSE:DENT), which relies on investing through ETFs a lot, the acquired fund fees and expenses come in at 0.17%. Another fund that invests similarly is One Fund (NYSE:ONEF) and their acquired fund fee comes in at 0.16%. It’s important to recognize that these fees can pay a relatively large role in pushing up the overall operating expenses for Active ETFs and investors should not just look at the management fee, but the total operating expenses that include the acquired fund fees.

Look Out: Fee Waivers

One especially important element to look out for in new actively-managed ETFs is fee waivers. Issuers often launch new funds with attached fee waivers that help to reduce the overall expense ratio for investors. The lower expense ratios are intended to attract investors up-front but the fee waivers usually expire around the 1 or 2-year mark, after the launch of the fund. For example, each of PIMCO’s 3 bond funds has a net expense ratio of 0.35%, but that includes a fee waiver from PIMCO of 0.14% that has been contractually agreed upon by PIMCO, but will expire on October 31, 2011. If PIMCO chooses not to extend that fee waiver beyond that date, the expenses of the fund will rise to 0.48%. As such, to take into account what the expenses of the actively-managed ETF might rise up to, look out for the “Gross” or “Total” operating expenses that will not include fee waiver, whereas the “Net” expenses will be the effective reduced expense ratio investors will pay within the contractually agreed period.

Written By Shishir Nigam from ActiveETFs | InFocus

Shishir Nigam is the founder of ActiveETFs | InFocus (http://www.etfshub.com/), which provides extensive coverage and analysis of actively-managed ETFs in US and Canada, including debates on major industry trends, insights on the latest product launches from issuers in the Active ETF space as well as in-depth interviews with industry executives and thought leaders.

Disclosure: No positions in above-mentioned names.
 
Disclaimer: Views and opinions expressed on EtfsHub are those of the author alone and do not in any way represent the official views, positions or opinions of the employers – both past or present – of the author in question, or any other institutions and corporations associated with the author. Neither the information nor any opinions contained or expressed above and elsewhere on EtfsHub constitutes or should be construed as a solicitation or offer by EtfsHub to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or recommendations. None of the material above and elsewhere on EtfsHub is intended to endorse or promote any company or its products. EtfsHub shall not be liable for any claims or losses of any nature, arising indirectly or directly from use of the information on or accessed through the site. Please see full disclaimers here.

NYSE:DENT, NYSE:GMMB, ONEF