Home > Toyota’s Plans May Sink Rare Earth Metal ETFs? (REMX, LIT, SKOR, EWY)
Print

Toyota’s Plans May Sink Rare Earth Metal ETFs? (REMX, LIT, SKOR, EWY)

January 19th, 2011

With oil once again approaching $100/bbl., investors are becoming increasingly bullish on everything alternative as solar, wind, and clean tech companies have all seen 2011 start off much better than 2010 ended up. This renewed optimism for clean tech investing has caused many investors to take another look at some of the industries most vital to the production of these components, such as rare earth metals and lithium.

This is especially important in the hybrid and electric car industry, where rare earths and lithium are increasingly crucial. Rare earths are used in the Nissan Leaf, the Chevy Volt, Honda Insight, and Toyota Prius, creating a broad base of companies in needs of rare earth metals to drive growth of new product lines. Lithium also plays a very important role as well; virtually all of the cars listed above rely on lithium-ion batteries to store power for their propulsion systems, ensuring that the production and development of these battery systems remain crucial for the next generation of autos as well [also read Ten Commandments Of ETF Investing].

However, many companies are growing increasingly concerned over the markets for these elements as a few choice countries–China for rare earths and the Andean nations of South America for lithium–control vast quantities of the world’s known supply, potentially putting a number of industries at the mercy of foreign governments. Due to this reality, many firms have begun to look for alternatives to rare earths in order to power new technologies that will not have to be victims to future supply disruptions. One company that is at the forefront of this development is Toyota, the world’s largest seller of hybrids, thanks in large part to the popularity of its Prius vehicle [see Dude Where's My Car ETF?].


Toyota is sinking vast sums into research and development of new technologies which seek to limit the needs for rare earth metals. This is especially important for Toyota, since the Japanese have had a long-standing rivalry with the Chinese who are rapidly developing a car industry of their own. Toyota would hate to fall prey in the future because of this scenario, and as a result is rapidly developing alternatives to the current system. Recently announced plans call for Toyota to completely phase-out rare earth metals from its increasingly popular alternative-power cars . “This is something that we have to address as more manufacturing of electric vehicles and hybrids come on line,” said Jana Hartline Toyota’s environmental communication manager in regards to rare earth metal supplies. “Does that mean next week? No. It becomes a legitimate thing to consider when you talk about production in the order of millions over several years.”

Toyota is also planning on developing a new battery to replace the current industry standard of lithium-ion as well. These new magnesium-sulfur batteries can potentially hold twice as much energy as their lithium-based counterparts–as much as 4,000 watt hours/liter of electricity according to Toyota engineers. According to some sources, Toyota does not believe that lithium can really be a viable power storage device for cars on a mass scale and that better alternatives will need to be developed in order to truly bring electric cars to the masses. “Going from nickel-metal hydride to lithium ion, you essentially double the energy capacity,” Jeffrey Makarewicz said. “Lithium ion theoretically, under ideal conditions, has a capacity of about 2,000 kilowatt hours. That’s still not enough to really make a very competitive battery that’s necessary for future plug-in, electric and hybrid-electric vehicles.” [also see Three ETFs To Play The Coming Energy Storage Boom]

If these plans take off as some are expecting them to, it could create an obstacle for the still young rare earth metal and lithium industries, potentially choking off growth in the not-to-distant future. While it is true that both will still be extremely important to a variety of key applications that are crucial to modern life no matter what happens in the car industry, the fact remains that their exclusion from the next generation of automobiles would be a tremendous blow to the industry at large. Below, we profile the two ETFs tracking this increasingly important industry and how they could be impacted by this news from the world’s hybrid car leader.

Market Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metal ETF (NYSE:REMX)

For investors seeking exposure to the broad rare earth metal sector (NYSE:REMX) makes for a compelling choice. The fund tracks the Market Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, a rules based, modified capitalization weighted, float adjusted index intended to give investors a means of tracking the overall performance of publicly traded companies primarily engaged in a variety of activities that are related to the mining, refining and manufacturing of rare earth/strategic metals. The ETF offers exposure to 24 securities in total including heavy exposure to companies based in Australia, Canada, and the U.S. Top individual holdings go towards two Australian firms, Lynas Corp and Iluka Resources, with Canada’s Thompson Creek Metals trailing not far behind. Despite being relatively new, REMX has already caught on with investors trading roughly 1.3 million shares a day with an AUM of just over $300 million, making it already one of the most popular ETFs in the Commodity Producer Equities ETFdb Category.

Global X Lithium ETF (NYSE:LIT)

This Global X Lithium ETF (NYSE:LIT) has a more narrow focus than its counterpart from Van Eck, targeting the lithium industry. LIT tracks the Solactive Global Lithium Index which is comprised of companies engaged in some aspect of the lithium industry such as lithium mining, exploration and lithium-ion battery production. The fund strives to maintain a 50/50 split between lithium miners and battery producers and currently has its top holding in Chilean mining firm SQM, which makes up roughly 23% of the fund’s total assets, and its second biggest holding in FMC Corp (19%), a company known for its lithium compound production prowess [see more on LIT's Holdings page].

Death of an Industry?

Assuming Toyota’s plans to replace rare earths and lithium succeed, it will represent a large setback for the sector since a major area of growth will likely be choked off. However, thanks to the extremely well-diversified nature of uses for these products the industries are likely to survive and even prosper for decades to come. Rare earth metals remain crucial for a variety of other in-demand products including jet engines, flat-panel TVs, and precision-guided weapon systems. Lithium finds its way into roughly 90% of laptops and 60% of cell phones as well as a variety of less advanced uses such as glass. These markets are likely to retain their needs for the metals far longer than the ultra-competitive car industry where vast quantities of the elements must be used, a scenario which forces the automakers to always be considering alternatives in order to keep costs low and profits high. The metals in the above ETFs are simply too important to too much of modern society to fall by the wayside without a seismic technological shift that even Toyota is unlikely to be able to bring to bear on the markets, suggesting that although the recent developments are not great news for the industry, they are far from the death-kneel that some are forecasting it to be [see Strategic Metal ETFs Head-to-Head: REMX vs. LIT].

South Korean equities have been in focus as of late but for all the wrong reasons; rising tensions with the often volatile North finally bubbled over earlier this year as the communist regime shelled an island of their long-time South Korean rival. The South Koreans responded in kind, launching mortars of their own while scrambling jets in preparation for any further escalation [see Korea ETFs Plummet As North/South Tensions Flare]. Unsurprisingly, this situation led to a rapid sell-off in Korean equities as investors fled the hot spot for safer markets with less geopolitical risk. However, as cooler heads prevailed investors slowly returned their assets to the dynamic South Korean market in an attempt to find beaten down companies that were unfairly punished by the rising tensions. This trend looks likely to continue given recent events that took place between the leaders of South Korea and the U.S. which could give Korean firms a much needed boost heading into 2011.

After much delay and political concerns, a free trade deal between the United States and South Korea has finally been approved, potentially giving a boost to both nations’ economies. The pact will remove 95% of tariffs between the two nations within five years helping to cut down barriers between two of the world’s top fifteen economies. Both sides made concessions in order to hopefully make the deal more palatable to their respective legislative branches as the Koreans protected their pork industry while the Americans received several concessions related to automobile tariffs. “To some who say that this was a one-sided concession, I cannot agree because I feel that the agreement was a win-win situation for both countries,” said Korean Trade Minister Kim Jong-hoon about the deal. “South Korean car sales to the U.S. will see limited impact from the revision.”

The deal is being touted as the biggest free trade deal for the U.S. since NAFTA and could significantly increase bilateral trade in the near-term and even help the U.S. to increase exports to the country by close to $11 billion a year, potentially creating thousands of much needed jobs back in the states. From the Korean side, economists are predicting that the deal will boost the nation’s GDP by 0.6% per year for the next ten years and while 34,000 jobs are expected to be created every year during the time period as well [read ETFs For The 'Next 11' Economies].

Hold on a second…

Now will likely come the hard part for the Obama administration as the FTA must be ratified by both houses of Congress before it can become law. Of particular concern is likely to be if the deal remains balanced enough to garner support from both the Democratic majority in the Senate and the Republican majority in the House. Both groups are likely to have their own misgivings about the deal, especially given how little reaching across the aisle there has been in the past few years and the often-controversial nature of the NAFTA agreement. Meanwhile, a similar situation is brewing in Seoul as anti-free trade protesters have stepped up their criticism of the agreement in recent days. However, this has not been limited to protests on the streets as several political parties have joined in including Park Jie-won, floor leader of the Democratic Party, who called the new agreement a “humiliating and treacherous deal.”

If both Korea and the U.S. are able to move past these political issues it could end up being a huge boost to the Korean economy and could continue the nation’s free trade agreement boom. The country already has FTAs with both the ASEAN bloc and Chile plus, starting in the next few years, the small rapidly developing nation in north Asia could now have FTA with both the U.S. and the EU; two economic blocs that combine to make up close to half of the world’s GDP. Should this free trade bonanza come to pass, it could end up being a blessing for the nation’s many exporters and decrease costs for consumers at home as well. Thanks to the historic nature of this event,  we highlight two ETFs that offer investors exposure to the in-focus Korean market:

IQ South Korea Small Cap ETF (NYSE:SKOR)

For investors seeking companies that are likely to benefit from the FTA’s positive effects on consumption, (NYSE:SKOR) makes for an interesting pick. SKOR tracks the IQ South Korean Small Cap Index which is a market cap-weighted benchmark seeks to provide investors with a means of tracking the overall performance of the small capitalization sector of publicly traded companies domiciled and primarily listed on an exchange in South Korea. Currently, the fund has 102 holdings with heavy weightings in the industrial materials (19%) and consumer goods (12.1%) sectors. In terms of market cap levels, 54% of the fund goes towards mid caps while the remainder is invested in small and micro cap securities. SKOR charges investors an expense ratio of 79 basis points but has managed to return 6.1% to investors year to date and 25% over the past half year period [read Playing The Emerging Markets Though Small Cap ETFs].

iShares MSCI South Korea Index Fund (NYSE:EWY)

If you are more sold on the boost in exports to the U.S. thanks to this deal, than (NYSE:EWY) could make for a quality choice. This popular iShares fund tracks the MSCI Korea Index which is a benchmark that measures the performance of the South Korean equity market with a heavy focus on large cap names. The fund’s top holdings include electronics giant Samsung (15.1%), as well as steel maker Posco (5.6%) and car manufacturer Hyundai Motor (4.8%). Ironically, this fund also has 102 securities, except unlike SKOR, this fund has a heavy focus on IT (26.3%) as well as a near 15.5% weighting in each of the following four sectors; industrials, financials, consumer discretionary, and materials. EWY charges a slightly lower expense ratio than its small cap counterpart coming in at just 63 basis points. Additionally, the fund has had better luck in terms of return as well, posting a gain of 19.5% so far in 2010 [also see ETF Plays On The Next Developed Markets].

Written By Eric Dutram From ETF Database   Disclosure: Eric is long LIT.

ETF Database is committed to giving our audience, consisting of both active traders and buy-and-hold investors, information that, to our knowledge, is truthful and non-biased. [For more ETF insights, sign up for our free ETF newsletter or try a free seven day trial of ETFdb Pro ETFdb Pro Members Only.]


NYSE:EWY, NYSE:LIT, NYSE:REMX, NYSE:SKOR


 

Tags: ,

Facebook Comments

Comments



  1. James
    April 17th, 2011 at 09:43 | #1

    You will notice that nowhere do you see a comparison how much the electrical current consumption varies between a non-rare earth magnet and a rare earth based motor design. Neodymium magnets are over 10x stronger than the strongest ceramic magnets. I believe Toyota has come up with nothing terribly new, they have just optimized the flux fields and put in a larger heavier magnet with the hope it will create a buzz of some new great innovation. I see nothing dramatically new in their design from the photo provided. I would not be surprised that their “new” motor uses more electrical energy to make up for the loss in not using a rare earth magnet. That may work ok, but mileage will suffer hence no talk of power consumption by Toyota. Also to be considered, when you increase the use of electricity to create more magnetic flux you also increase the heat in the motor making both the magnets loose strength and also increase the electrical resistance in the electrical motor windings.

  1. No trackbacks yet.




Copyright 2009-2014 WBC Media, LLC