The Bureau of Labor Statistics released their official Consumer Price Index for February on Friday (up 0.4% MoM; up 2.9% YoY):
We also have the BLS seasonally the so-called “core” measure of prices ex. food and energy (up 0.1% MoM; up 2.2% YoY):
According to most economists including the Fed, this “inflation” is modest and acceptable, if not desirable. The 2.9% annual rate is more or less within the Fed’s target for “inflation.”
There is much criticism about the CPI indicators. But, you can pick other measures. In fact inflation can be whatever you want it to be.
For example, if you are wary of the BLS measures, then there is John Williams of Shadowstats who has two measures. One is based on the same methodology that the BLS used in 1990 (up 6.2% YoY):
Or, if you prefer, there is his version of the BLS’s 1980 base year methodology (up 10.2% YoY):
Or you can use the MIT Billion Price Project annual index which is up 2.8% as of February 1:
Another way to look at it is this way, the devaluation of the dollar since the creation of the Fed:
Today the value of the dollar is about 3¢ as measure from1913 when the Fed became our central bank.
Understand that there is a lot of criticism of each of these measures of prices. What each one is trying to tell us is how much our dollars have depreciated from month-to-month and year-to-year.
I don’t know which of the above is the correct measure. In fact I don’t think there is a correct measure because it is a very complex problem to measure prices over time and everyone spends differently. I think the better measure is more related to money supply, but that is a different topic. In general I personally believe that prices are higher than what the BLS reports, but I’m not a statistician.
I think the most important thing for us to know is (1) whether or not prices are constantly increasing at whichever method you choose, and (2) how fast the monthly and annual rates change. Steady price inflation will kill you over the longer term. Rapid changes in the rates of change can wipe you out.
I don’t mean to state the obvious here, but we all need to protect ourselves from the dollar’s devaluation or we will become poorer and poorer over time. I bring this up because I don’t think most people understand what a “little inflation” can do to one’s long-term financial plans. If prices rise a steady 3% per year, for example, I know my $1,000 savings is going to have to be $1,344 in ten years just to stay even (i.e., it’s worth 34% less).
And if you think assets and wages always keep up with prices, the past two recessions should dissuade you from that thought. Right now we have a situation where the dollar is continuing to devalue and workers wages are actually going down. Here is Friday’s report on real (i.e., inflation adjusted) earnings (down 0.3%):
If the Fed keeps on creating these booms and busts which first lead people down a path of wealth destruction (what’s your house worth now?) and then they devalue the dollar (i.e., “print” money) in order to try to stimulate a recovery but which further destroys capital, how can one get ahead? From the data, it seems that most people aren’t getting ahead. In fact the system is now geared more toward the One Percenters who thrive on the financialization of the economy.
The Fed knows exactly what it is doing. While the official line is that the U.S. wants a “strong” dollar, the Fed and the federal government are doing everything they can to devalue it. Chairman Bernanke believes that a little bit of inflation is an acceptable trade-off because it spurs economic growth. Why he thinks the destruction of wealth is the road to wealth is not a mystery: it is the foundation of contemporary economics of which he is an advocate. He understands that printing money causes prices to go up, and thus he is consciously devaluing the dollar.
If printing money were the elixir of prosperity, bankers would have made us all rich long ago. It is too bad that Chairman Bernanke does not understand that Federal Notes are not wealth, but economic nanobots that consume and destroy that scarce resource, savings. Only the savings from the profits of production can create wealth.
What Do I Do?
“What do I do?” is the question I am asked most often. It depends on your level of wealth, but … It is likely that the longer-term will see higher price inflation than what we are now experiencing so this is a serious question.
I’m not trying to avoid the issue on how to protect your wealth, but we don’t give investment advice here. DoctoRx has an excellent track record on investments, so I urge you to pay attention to him.
I will give you some categories of investment that anyone seeking to protect themselves from price inflation should consider:
Gold. You can buy physical gold or shares in companies that hold gold. The Doc has recommended PHYS in the past. The point is that gold is money, and is a refuge against instability.
Oil and Gas. This product will be demand until cold fusion or the perfect sun-powered battery is invented. I like the idea of actually owning production and there are reputable drilling programs one can invest in.
Agricultural production. Food will always be in demand in an unstable world. This usually means investing in ag land, but there are farming partnerships one can invest in if one isn’t a farmer.
Stocks and bonds. I’m not a big believer in buy and hold, so you’ve got to know what you are doing, or you’ve got to invest in someone who does. I personally follow DoctoRx. There are many others, but you’ve got to do the research. Be wary of “track records.” There are still more Madoffs out there. The irony is that anyone with a fabulous track record (hedge funds and investment advisers) can require millions to hundreds of millions to get in. Most of the rest who invite you in eventually go to the mean (at best) or blow up (worst case).
Offshore assets. This is a bit of a snake pit, but investing in fast growing companies in friendly economies is a way to diversify out of the U.S. You can’t hide assets from your Uncle Sam, but … you can get good returns.
These suggestions aren’t new and many advisers who follow the Daily Capitalist or sites like this (are there any?) say the same things. So I am not telling you anything new.
This is a serious game. It is no secret that most Boomers don’t have enough assets to allow themselves to retire. I fear that most retirees will be reliant on the government to take care of them (Social Security and Medicare). If you have saved, but stuck the assets in a CD, you are getting poorer and poorer as those nanobots destroy your savings. It’s not an easy task and you can thank the Fed and the federal government for that.
Here are my basic rules:
You’ve got to have a plan and you must save. You must not spend all of your income. This seems so simple, yet few people really do it. There are many books on the topic of planning for retirement and how much you need to save. There are retirement counselors who can help you devise a plan. Just be careful of what they are selling.
You’ve got to do your own research and do not accept anything on the basis of a word or promise.
You must check advisers out. Don’t accept a demonstration portfolio, rather ask to talk to other clients and see their real-time results. If they can’t provide the information, go elsewhere.
Don’t give anyone your money to invest without keeping it in a segregated account. I understand that there are partnership deals and mutual funds where this isn’t possible. Investment advisers can have discretionary authority, but the money should remain in your name.
Does the person or firm giving advice have deep pockets? Are they audited by a prominent company?
Don’t pay attention to those who sell fear. We’ve all seen the ads on the Web about the certainty of imminent collapse. I’m not exactly an optimist about the economy, but fear as a sales tool has a false ring.
Generally those who have been around a long time have some credibility and staying power. Of course Madoff was a Wall Street fixture, but there is a good example of accepting his word on faith.
Stock brokers sell what their company tells them to sell. If they were really good, they would be running their own investment firm. As we have seen even the great companies such as Goldman Sachs can fail to serve their clients’ interests.
Pay attention to the business cycle. This is one of the things we try to analyze here at the Daily Capitalist. Where you are in the cycle is one of the most important thing an investor can know. Buying a home in 2008 would have been a bad move. Buying groceries.com before the Dotcom crash would have been a bad move.
If it’s too good to be true, it isn’t. Of course this is the Ponzi scheme hook. My theory is that boom-bust business cycles have created a meme of constant speculation in our society. People think that “the Big Guys” always have the inside scoop and that’s why they get rich (but see Lehman Bros.). They lose out on one cycle and when the next one starts and making money seems easy, they want in. This leads to susceptibility to Ponzi artists and advisers who confuse their boom phase success with intelligence (they quickly blow up in the bust).
This is hard work. But remember that we are all in the same boat.
Related: SPDR Gold Trust (NYSEARCA:GLD), iShares Gold Trust (NYSEARCA:IAU), iShares Silver ETF (NYSEARCA:SLV), PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish ETF (NYSEARCA:UUP), PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bearish ETF (NYSEARCA:UDN).
The Daily Capitalist comments on economics, politics, and finance from a free market perspective. We try to present fresh ideas the reader would not find in contemporary media. We like to call it “unconventional wisdom.” Our main influences are from the Austrian School of economics. Among its leading thinkers are Carl Menger, Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich von Hayek, and Murray Rothbard. There are many practitioners of this school today and some of their blogs are shown on the blogroll. We trace our political philosophy back to Edmund Burke, David Hume, John Locke, and Thomas Jefferson, to name a few.
Our goal is to challenge contemporary economic thinking, mainly from those who promote Keynesian economics (almost everyone) and those who rely on statist solutions to problems. We apply Austrian theory economics to investments, finance, investment risk, and the business cycle. We have found that our view has been superior in analyzing and understanding economic and market forces. We don’t consider ourselves Democrats or Republicans, right wing or left wing. But rather we seek to promote free markets and political freedom.