Home > 3 Reasons Not To Flee Dividend Stocks
Print

3 Reasons Not To Flee Dividend Stocks

November 14th, 2012

Russ Koesterich: The election night parties were barely over last week before investors started selling stocks. While renewed uncertainty over Europe did not help, the source of the volatility was closer to home: The fiscal cliff. Washington now has seven weeks to reach a compromise — a failure to do so will mean the largest fiscal drag in the post-World War II period and a possible recession.

Many investors are particularly worried that dividend stocks are vulnerable given the potential for a near tripling of the tax on dividends. As I’ve said in previous blogs, I believe volatility will remain elevated and stocks will stay under pressure until the president and Congress produce a credible road map to a compromise. That said I don’t believe dividend stocks — with one exception — are any more vulnerable than the broader market. Here’s why:

    Have you ever wondered how billionaires continue to get RICHER, while the rest of the world is struggling?


    "I study billionaires for a living. To be more specific, I study how these investors generate such huge and consistent profits in the stock markets -- year-in and year-out."

    CLICK HERE to get your Free E-Book, “The Little Black Book Of Billionaires Secrets”

  1. Many dividend stocks are held in non-taxable accounts. Whether held by institutional investors or by individuals in tax-deferred retirement accounts, a change in the dividend tax rate will have no immediate impact on holders of these securities.
  2. Historically, when dividend tax rates have risen, companies have made investors whole on an after-tax basis by raising their dividends to offset the higher tax rate. Given  that US corporate balance sheets are generally very healthy with S&P 500 companies sitting on more than $2 trillion in cash, and payout ratios are close to historic lows, companies appear to have the wherewithal to increase dividends should taxes rise.
  3. Many high dividend payers are concentrated in defensive industries, like healthcare and consumer staples. These companies tend to be less economically sensitive than other industries. As a result, they typically outperform when the economy is under threat because they’re less vulnerable to a fall in earnings than more cyclical companies.

While I’m comfortable with dividend paying stocks in general, there is one major exception: US utilities. Prior to the Bush tax cuts in 2003, utility stocks typically traded at a significant discount to other segments of the market. This made sense because utilities are a slow-growing, regulated industry. However, since the inception of the Bush tax cuts the sector has been growing progressively more expensive relative to other segments of the market. Today, US utility companies are trading at a slight premium to the broader market. Should the preferential rate on dividends expire, I believe the utility sector may be uniquely vulnerable because it is likely to suffer significant multiple compression.

Over the next seven weeks, investors will need to spend a disproportionate amount of time handicapping the odds of going over the fiscal cliff. If the tax hikes and spending cuts hit, and they are allowed to remain in place for any length of time, I believe that the United States is vulnerable to another recession. Under this scenario stocks will come under significant pressure. However, in the event of another recession, the tax rate on dividends may be the least of an investor’s worries. Dividend stocks will be hit, but probably no worse than the rest of the market. If anything, a defensive tilt – ex-utilities – is probably a reasonable place to hide.

Written By Russ Koesterich From The iShares Blog 

Russ  Koesterich, CFA, is the iShares Global Chief Investment Strategist as well as the Global Head of Investment Strategy for BlackRock Scientific Active Equities. Russ initially joined the firm  (originally Barclays  Global Investors) in 2005 as a Senior Portfolio Manager in the US Market Neutral Group. Prior to joining BGI, Russ managed several  research groups focused on quantitative and top down  strategy. Russ began his career at Instinet in New York, where he occupied several  positions in research, including Director of Investment Strategy for  both US and European research. In addition, Russ served as  Chief North  American Strategist for State Street Bank in Boston.

Russ holds a JD from Boston College Law School, an MBA from Columbia Business School, and is a holder of the CFA designation. He is also a frequent contributor to the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Associated Press, as well as CNBC and Bloomberg Television. In 2008,  Russ published “The ETF Strategist”(Portfolio Books) focusing on using exchange traded funds to manage risk and return within a portfolio.


ETF BASIC NEWS


 

Tags: , , , ,

Facebook Comments

Comments



  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.




Copyright 2009-2014 WBC Media, LLC