Because the past 30 years have consisted of generally expanding trade liberalization and global trade (shown in Figure 1), we are left with limited information on how financial markets would likely respond. Below, I discuss Invesco Fixed Income’s view of how the situation could affect US macro fundamentals, and I highlight the potential impact on fixed income markets.
Scope of US tariffs widens
The potential for a trade war went from rhetoric to reality on July 6 when the Trump administration levied tariffs on $34 billion of Chinese goods.1 Tariffs on another $16 billion of related Chinese goods is likely to take effect later this summer.1 The Trump administration has begun preparations for an additional round of tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods2 and has reportedly indicated that it is prepared to tariff a further $500 billion of Chinese goods.3 In addition to these China-related tariffs, the US government is preparing to impose tariffs on nearly $275 billion of foreign-made cars, including those made in Europe and Japan.4
Figure 1: Global trade has expanded over the past several decades
Source: International Monetary Fund, data from Dec. 31, 1975, to March 31, 2018.
Three ways a trade war could affect global markets
We at Invesco Fixed Income believe an intensified and prolonged global trade war would affect global markets in three ways. In our view:
- Valuations of major currencies would likely adjust with changes in global terms of trade.
- A trade war would likely bring down global growth.
- Asset prices would likely be subject to greater volatility.
Tariffs could hurt US growth, but how much?
A global trade war would likely damage US growth, in our view, but it is difficult to assess how much. Because one benefit of trade is access to lower-cost goods, trade restrictions imply a switch to higher-cost goods. Switching to higher-cost goods means higher consumer costs and lower inflation-adjusted incomes. Higher producer input costs could also be passed on to consumers. Each of these outcomes could dent consumption and, ultimately, growth.
In theory, product and input substitutions would limit the negative impact on growth. However, in reality, difficulty in quickly replacing newly tariffed goods means that sudden increases in trade restrictions would likely have an immediate impact on many of the global supply chains that have developed over the past 20 years. Disrupting global supply chains could create an economic shock that significantly lowers growth and productivity. However, the full impact remains unclear. To illustrate the differences in forecasts of the potential impact of a trade war on US growth, Goldman Sachs estimates a contraction in growth of 0.1%, while UBS estimates a drop of 1.0%.5
Currency markets likely to feel the most direct effects
We believe that some of the most significant impacts of the trade war are likely to manifest themselves in the currency markets. Increased trade restrictions will likely hurt currencies of countries whose current account deficits are pressured higher or whose surpluses are eroded due to altered terms of trade. Higher US tariffs on China would likely cause a decrease in China’s current account surplus and the renminbi’s trade-based valuation
The impact on the US dollar would likely be positive as the US current account deficit would potentially decrease under more protectionist policies. An increase in the value of the US dollar could accelerate if US trading partners use their currencies as retaliatory tools. China could intervene in foreign exchange markets, for example, to lower the value of the renminbi and boost the competitiveness of its exports.
Second-order effects could pose the biggest risk
The biggest risk, in our view, from further rounds of tariffs is a tightening of financial conditions, which could be strong enough to significantly curtail US growth. Financial conditions tend to tighten when asset price volatility is high. It is possible to envision a scenario in which the secondary effects of tighter financial conditions outweigh the initial impact of the trade restrictions themselves. Changing tariff rates, for example, could cause speculation that certain companies are at greater risk of default, leading to increased equity volatility and wider credit spreads. In this scenario, financing costs could rise for the entire US economy. Tighter financial conditions would likely decrease growth unless policymakers stepped in to stabilize them.
How might fixed income markets respond?
Under a trade war scenario, we would expect financial conditions to tighten, leading to a more uncertain growth outlook and potentially greater asset price volatility. Greater uncertainty about growth and increased market volatility could depress long-term interest rates and cause credit spreads to widen. This combination could lead the Federal Reserve to pause in its interest rate hiking cycle. Despite lower interest rates, we believe the US dollar would likely appreciate due to a flight to quality toward US assets.
1 Source: The Washington Post, “U.S. levies tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese imports,” July 6, 2018
2 Source: CNBC, “Trump administration announces list of tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods,” July 10, 2018
3 Source: Reuters, “Trump threatens tariffs on all $500 billion of Chinese imports,” July 20, 2018
4 Source: Goldman Sachs, Economics Research, “Dissecting the Effect of Tariffs on US-China Trade,” July 9, 2018.
5 Sources: Goldman Sachs, Economics Research, “The Trade War: An Update, June 25, 2018.” UBS, Global Research, “Trade Wars — What is the impact on growth, inflation and financial markets? A Top Down view.”
Macro fundamentals refer to events or measurements that can affect a given economy. These include unemployment rates, inflation, monetary policy and international trade.
Fixed income investments are subject to credit risk of the issuer and the effects of changing interest rates. Interest rate risk refers to the risk that bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise and vice versa. An issuer may be unable to meet interest and/or principal payments, thereby causing its instruments to decrease in value and lowering the issuer’s credit rating.
The risks of investing in securities of foreign issuers, including emerging market issuers, can include fluctuations in foreign currencies, political and economic instability, and foreign taxation issues.
The Invesco QQQ (QQQ) closed at $180.52 on Friday, down $1.39 (-0.76%). Year-to-date, QQQ has gained 16.08%, versus a 6.53% rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index during the same period.
This article is brought to you courtesy of Invesco.