One of the most famous names in the consumer products world – Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) – let investors down on January 27, 2015 by missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate for both earnings and sales in second-quarter fiscal 2015 — for the second successive quarter. In addition, the cut in fiscal 2015 outlook to reflect currency issues also dampened investors’ mood.
Procter & Gamble’s 2Q15 Earnings in Focus
The consumer staple giant’s 2Q15 adjusted earnings of $1.06 per share (excluding restructuring charges) fell short of the the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.14 by 7% and decreased 8% from the year-ago earnings hurt by steeper-than-expected currency concerns. Excluding currency headwinds, earnings increased 6% in the quarter buoyed by productivity savings that compensated for sluggish margins.
Net sales were down year over year to $20.16 billion due to a 5% headwind from currency and, to add to the concern, missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $20.70 billion. With around 60% of the company’s business generated outside North America, a strong dollar marred the value of international sales. However, organic revenues (excluding the impact of acquisitions, divestitures and foreign exchange) grew 2% on pricing gain that allayed weaker volumes.
Added to the miss on both lines, analysts and investors zeroed in on the disappointing guidance by the company. Management essentially reiterated its currency neutral organic sales and core earnings per share guidance, though a higher-than-expected adverse impact from currency forced management to slash its net sales and earnings projection.
Net revenue growth is now expected to decline in the range of 3–4% instead of the prior expectation of it being flat to up in a low single-digit range. The company expects core earnings per share to be flat or to decline in a low single-digit range versus the prior expectation of a mid single-digit rise.
Management expects doubling of the negative currency translation to core earnings per share and predicts currency impacts to hurt core earnings per share by 12%. Excluding currency headwinds, management expects double-digit core earnings per share growth.
Consumer ETF impact
Thanks to a downbeat earnings release, shares of PG hurtled down about 4.4% (as of January 29, 2015) since it reported Q2 earnings. The pain also carried over into the ETF world, with consumer staples ETFs being the hardest hit. Many of the key funds in this segment have a double-digit allocation to the consumer product giant, suggesting that the performance of the fund is highly dependent on P&G’s performance.
And, since many smaller companies in the sector were also impacted by PG’s weakness, they too had a tough time, leading to sluggish trading overall for the segment. In particular though, poor trading was seen in the following three ETFs, as these have the biggest allocation to Procter & Gamble:
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSEARCA:XLP)
The most popular consumer ETF on the market, XLP, follows the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. The fund invests about $9.87 billion of assets in 39 holdings. Of these firms, the in-focus P&G takes the first spot, making up roughly 13% of the assets.
In terms of sector exposure, the fund is skewed toward food & staples retailing which makes up for one-fourth share, closely followed by beverages (20.6%) and household products (20.3%). The fund charges 16 bps in fees per year from investors. The fund has returned about 1% so far this year but lost about 2.6% in the last five trading sessions (as of January 29, 2015).