Jim Bach: Yesterday (Monday), the U.S. Federal Reserve approved a rule requiring the nation’s largest banks to hold a larger capital buffer.
These “capital surcharges” are in addition to the 7% capital requirements set forth in the Basel Accords in 2010.
The Federal Reserve System has identified eight banking institutions as “global systemically important bank holding companies” – GSIBs – that will be subject to the capital surcharge ruling.
They include Bank of America Corp. (NYSE:BAC); Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (NYSE:BK); Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C); Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE:GS); JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM); Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS); State Street Corp. (NYSE: STT); and Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE:WFC).
The Federal Reserve System capital surcharges will be phased in beginning on Jan. 1, 2016, and will end on Jan. 1, 2019.
They range from 1% to 4.5%, based on each firm’s risk-weighted assets.
The impact of building up a capital buffer is still very much unknown.
At this point, almost every financial institution on the Federal Reserve System list of GSIBs adheres to these new capital surcharge rules.
The only exception is JPMorgan. Several reports indicate that JPMorgan is $12.5 billion short of the $200 billion requirement.
This may be a result of JPMorgan’s success weathering the global financial crisis.
You see, JPMorgan was the firm that bought Bear Stearns in 2008 with the help of a $29 billion Fed loan.
Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson even offered to hand Morgan Stanley over to JPMorgan as the global financial crisis roiled on.
So for all intents and purposes, JPMorgan faces the largest capital surcharge because it weathered the global financial crisis better than most firms and emerged an even bigger consolidated banking giant.
The ruling stems from a Dodd-Frank provision that mandates the Federal Reserve System adopt enhanced capital standards should there be a bank run that threatens the global financial system.
This is a positive development for a Federal Reserve System that has been asleep at the regulatory wheel.
“So far, the Fed’s ‘appropriate compliance regimes’ let big banks get away with manipulating Libor, foreign exchange markets, metals markets, and energy prices,” Money MorningCapital Wave Strategist Shah Gilani said. “And that’s just a few of the big cheating regimes banks have lorded over.”
But it reveals something more telling about the big banks.