While U.S. stock performance initially turned lucrative winning over the Chinese companies, the ETF view does not appear that smooth. There are presently two ETFs available in the solar energy space – Guggenheim Solar ETF (TAN) and Market Vectors Solar Energy ETF (KWT). Both the ETFs have considerable exposure in China which put the duo at risk.
American firms dominate TAN’s portfolio with nearly 42%, followed by China (25.26%) and Hong Kong (16.13%). Coming to KWT, U.S. takes more than one-third of the portfolio, closely followed by China (34.0%) and Taiwan (15.7%). Quite understandably, TAN and KWT lost 2.33% and 1.71%, respectively, last week.
Can the ETFs Rebound?
Solar ETFs are sitting on the fence at present. Research agency GTM elaborated on the dependence of the U.S. on Chinese imports saying about 50% of the solar equipment installed in the U.S. last year were imported from China. In the rooftop solar sector, another flourishing area, the Chinese contribution was 71%.
On the other hand, investors should note that solar industry in the U.S. expanded about 76% in 2012 despite the levy of import duties. Moreover, the demand scenario is shaping up well for the sector as evident from the stellar Q1 installation number.
According to an analyst, total solar panel installations will likely hit 6.6 gigawatts this year, thanks to the increased demand from residential rooftop systems and more than 12 gigawatts of work-in-progress utility projects (read: Will Solar ETFs be Powered by Earnings Beat?).
There is no doubt that cheap Chinese imports contributed in pushing these activities northward, but the recent levy might give some benefits to homegrown companies to expand. This is a dicey situation for the U.S. solar companies with scope for market share gain at one hand and likely loss of customers in view of price rises on the other.
Whatever be the case, the decision is yet to get the official seal. Till then, investors can try out Solar ETFs as the broader market trends remain enthusiastic, but with great caution.
This article is brought to you courtesy of Zacks.com