Don’t Be Fooled By September’s Market Rally (ACWV, EFAV, EEMV, USMV)

Russ Koesterich: September’s rally was surprisingly strong, counteracting the normal negative seasonal bias. But investors should consider adopting a more defensive stance into the fall as the rally masked some troublesome deterioration in the economic environment.

Since 1896, September has had an average return of slightly worse than -1%, the only month of the year with a statistically significant bias. But this year September did not play to script. As of Friday, the S&P 500 closed up 2.4% for the month, Europe 2.7%, Brazil 3.7% and Hong Kong 7%. Three factors combined to contribute to the unusually strong month:

  1. Massive new liquidity programs from the major central banks;
  2. Market momentum; and
  3. A lot of good luck.

In short, we got more than expected from both the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank with their new asset purchase programs. And historically, September’s negative seasonal bias is much less pronounced in years when the market is up year-to-date, as is the case this year. Finally, much of the event risk that investors were worried about in Europe and the Middle East failed to materialize.

However, investors might be ignoring some troubling data on the economic front, particularly in the United States. One reason we’re a bit nervous about investor complacency is that along with the market rally, implied volatility collapsed in September. At the beginning of the month, the VIX Index–which measures implied volatility–was at 17.5, below its long-term average. As of last Friday, it was at around 15.

While the drop in volatility was partly justified by improving credit conditions, other factors that typically drive volatility have deteriorated. The Chicago Fed National Activity Index is now at its lowest level since mid-2009, which suggests much slower economic growth. In addition, we still have the looming risk of the fiscal cliff, which doesn’t appear to be currently reflected in equity prices.

Given this environment, we think investors should consider shifting some exposure from market cap weighted indices towards minimum volatility. Minimum volatility portfolios historically have produced better risk-adjusted returns over the long term while providing some downside cushion amid uncertainty in the near term. They’re worth considering if you’re worried about the recent slowdown and the potential for a pickup in volatility. Minimum volatility can be accessed through funds such as:

  • iShares MSCI All Country World Minimum Volatility Index Fund (NYSEARCA:ACWV);
  • iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index Fund (NYSEARCA:EFAV);
  • iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index Fund (NYSEARCA:EEMV); and
  • iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index Fund (NYSEARCA:USMV).

Source: Bloomberg

Written By Russ Koesterich From The iShares Blog 

Russ  Koesterich, CFA, is the iShares Global Chief Investment Strategist as well as the Global Head of Investment Strategy for BlackRock Scientific Active Equities. Russ initially joined the firm  (originally Barclays  Global Investors) in 2005 as a Senior Portfolio Manager in the US Market Neutral Group. Prior to joining BGI, Russ managed several  research groups focused on quantitative and top down  strategy. Russ began his career at Instinet in New York, where he occupied several  positions in research, including Director of Investment Strategy for  both US and European research. In addition, Russ served as  Chief North  American Strategist for State Street Bank in Boston.

Russ holds a JD from Boston College Law School, an MBA from Columbia Business School, and is a holder of the CFA designation. He is also a frequent contributor to the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Associated Press, as well as CNBC and Bloomberg Television. In 2008,  Russ published “The ETF Strategist”(Portfolio Books) focusing on using exchange traded funds to manage risk and return within a portfolio.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *