German’s Incomplete Economic Recovery Supports the Bond Bull Market

The Daily Capitalist: Germany’s national economic statistical repository provides an interesting set of graphs that correlate with the collapsing interest rate structure in that country.  Two-year bunds now yield a negative 0.08% per year.  The 10-year bund yields 1.27%, down from over 2.1% only one year ago.   No wonder that with the U.S. interest rate structure so much higher, speculators have been piling into T-bond futures.

Here is a link to Statistisches Bundesamt.  Click on “Current” and then click on the “Production”, “New Orders”, and “Turnover” tabs.  You can then click on the graphs to enlarge them.

I was surprised to find that as in the U.S. production in the post-2009 recovery has not reached prior peaks.  It would have appeared from the headlines that Germany was soaring economically.  (The data does also show a bit of a construction boom– perhaps related to the low interest-rate environment?)  And of course, these charts are now pointing downward.

In addition to the perceived flight to safety into German bonds, similar supply-demand issues as occurred in Japan post-bubble era, and have been documented to have been occurring in the U.S., may be occurring in Germany.  This refers to the so-called “yotai gap”, an excess of demand to lend money to banks in government-guaranteed accounts over legitimate lending opportunities (LINKLINK).  So on the margin, where prices are set, savers have been competing to see who will accept the lowest rate in return for preservation of nominal capital.

On July 14 of this year, I said:

Savers are between the proverbial rock and hard place.  The prudent look in vain for easy solutions to this dilemma.  It turns out that there are none.  (LINK)

The title of the post expresses the viewpoint and fear that may be driving rates in the government bonds of the economically dominant countries to these microscopic and even negative yields, JPM’s Whale of a Problem and Futures Market Scandals May Help Lead to Negative Rates on Bank Deposits.

Regardless of the transitory issues such as trading losses at J.P. Morgan Chase, the fact remains that national government guarantees of one’s savings mean not just a lot, but everything in a pinch. After all, so long as the currency system is accepted by the public, even that historically-durable store of wealth, gold, must generally be converted to currency (tangible or electronic) in order to purchase life’s necessities.

People interested in those posts may also wish to review Why ZIRP Became Inevitable and Why It May Be With Us a Long Time (LINK), where I said in March of this year:

It is my contention that the U.S. has a “yotai gap” that has led to essentially zero interest rates on savings deposits throughout most of the U.S. banking system.  The Fed, in this context, is reactive as well as proactive in its implementation of a “zero interest rate policy” aka ZIRP.  The Federal Reserve is, after all, typically a cautious institution.  Just as it took many years of fighting the inflationary, rising rate trends that began in the early 1960s before the Fed joined with market forces to push interest rates to a level that finally made Treasurys more attractive than gold (“Volckerism”), it took the threat of a national run on the banking system following the collapse of Lehman in late 2008 to push the Fed to abandon all thoughts of the tightening bias that it had as late as mid-2008, many months into the recession that was not yet Great.

The United States dollar is the ultimate currency.  Thus as a holder of long-term Treasury bonds, it is reassuring from a price/yield perspective to see that while U.S. troops continue to be encamped in Germany, the flight to safety into that country’s markets have brought its interest rate structure to a notably lower level than that of the U.S.  Thus it appears reasonable to think that if there are further stresses on the global financial system, there is room for additional demand for safety of principal with some positive yield could continue to pressure the record-low Treasury interest rate structure even lower.

While one is in a bull market, one simply never knows when it will peak.  When it is over, and prices have dropped dramatically, it is easy to look back and say, “Lord, what fools these mortals were”.  Speculating on the fourth online pet supplies company is a much more obvious bubble behavior than simply owning a near-cash equivalent, namely the bonds issued by one’s own government.  Thus, and with Japan’s example and even that of the U.S. from the 1930′s into the 1950′s as examples of persistence of ultra-low interest rates, it is unclear in this specific case that there is a near-term end to what is widely called a “bond bubble”.

Futures markets positioning shows that hedge funds and institutions have been positioning themselves long Treasurys, just as they did this spring when they powered Treasury prices much higher (yields lower).  This does raise the risk profile, but it is also true that it takes bulls to make (perpetuate) a bull market.

So long as the U.S. economy fails to accelerate and savers willing give up almost one-tenth of one percent of their capital yearly for two years by purchasing German government debt, it is difficult for yours truly to call the ultimate top of the U.S. Treasury bull market, even though it is in its fourth decade of a bull market.

Related Tickers: ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA:TBT),  iShares Barclays 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Fund (NYSEARCA:IEF), ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA:TBF), iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treas Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:TLT), Barclays 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:SHY).

Written By DoctoRx From The Daily Capitalist

The Daily Capitalist comments on economics, politics, and finance  from a free market perspective. We try to present fresh ideas the reader  would not find in contemporary media. We like to call it  “unconventional wisdom.” Our main influences are from the Austrian  School of economics. Among its leading thinkers are Carl Menger, Ludwig  von Mises, Friedrich von Hayek, and Murray Rothbard. There are many  practitioners of this school today and some of their blogs are shown on  the blogroll. We trace our political philosophy back to Edmund Burke,  David Hume, John Locke, and Thomas Jefferson, to name a few.

Our goal is to challenge contemporary economic thinking, mainly from  those who promote Keynesian economics (almost everyone) and those who  rely on statist solutions to problems. We apply Austrian theory  economics to investments, finance, investment risk, and the business  cycle. We have found that our view has been superior in analyzing and  understanding economic and market forces. We don’t consider ourselves  Democrats or Republicans, right wing or left wing. But rather we seek to  promote free markets and political freedom.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *