We’re already hearing that uranium stocks are oversold. This is a cycle that happens every time a stock (or a market sector) gets slapped down. Pundits emerge to declare that an out-of-favor sector has been sold down to bargain levels. It’s time to buy in again, they chirp.
Sure enough, in the wake of the Japanese nuclear disaster, it certainly hasn’t taken long for the “oversold“ voices to chime in. As one wrote, “The fire sale in uranium stocks may be providing an excellent opportunity to enter this market or to add to positions”. Really?
Perhaps we should wait until the reactor fires are extinguished before considering such a rash move.
Another author, labeled an “opinion leader” at the popular Seeking Alpha website trumpets the following headline: “CCJ: An Oversold Uranium Dividend Stock with High Options Yields.”
Well, there’s no doubt that Cameco (NYSE:CCJ), the world’s largest uranium producer has suffered a so-called “meltdown”. But is it oversold?
Cameco Stock Performance, One Year
Cameco’s CEO, Jerry Grandey, minimizes the damage to his company. He says Japan’s nuclear crisis will probably cut Cameco’s uranium sales by as little as three to five percent, and this should be offset by greater Japanese consumption during the coming rebuild.
“There are 54 reactors in Japan, 11 are currently down, and some are likely to be brought back over time,” Grandey told a conference call. “Even if 11 units remained down, it wouldn’t be all that [economically] significant to Cameco.” Grandey also pledged to continue the expansion of Cameco’s uranium operations around the world.
Optimists point out that the world is on a global reactor-building binge.
China is critical to global expansion of uranium markets during this decade. But China has suspended approvals of new nuclear reactors pending a review of industry safety. Many other countries have done the same, including India and Germany. Venezuela has shelved its plans for nuclear construction permanently.
OK, let’s discount the opinions of Hugo Chavez. What about the future of the uranium industry? Emerging markets like China and India have an urgent need for more clean energy. There seems to be little doubt that current industry “reviews” will result in stricter safety standards and the construction of existing projects will likely continue.
Cameco’s Grandey was buoyant, saying, “I don’t think you’re going to see any material reduction globally in uranium demand, and I really don’t believe that some sixty plants that are under construction, and those that are planned, are going to be delayed in any significant way, whether they’re in China or India or the United Arab Emirates, or wherever they might be.”
Good luck with that prediction.
A “Glowing” Future?
The industry’s future is “red hot” according to CBS Business News writer David Phillips. Cameco and other uranium miners are already spending heavily on the construction of new mines and processing facilities. They’re still scrambling in anticipation of the global nuclear boom which seemed so inevitable before the Japanese disaster.
As I wrote several months ago, China had long term plans called for the construction of as many as 245 reactors. In the U.S., President Obama was expected to provide loan guarantees for a renewed nuclear energy industry in the U.S. It seemed like the industry had solved its problems and boom times were coming.
But, in the wake of the Japanese crisis, I believe that the optimists touting a rebound in the nuclear industry are premature at best. At worst, they may be flogging a dead horse.
It is difficult to overstate the gravity of the situation in Japan. As I write, food supplies in Japan have been found to be contaminated with radioactivity. Zirconium shells in the Japanese nuclear storage pools may turn out to be flammable. In the U.S., iodine pills are selling out.
If you think this is just the tail end of the story, think again.
The Wall Street Journal chirps that the Japanese reactor problem can’t become another Chernobyl because of design differences. But, in fact it could be every bit as bad. If the rods in the storage pool catch fire, much more radioactivity could be released. That’s just one potential disaster scenario that still looms.
As the cleanup begins we will certainly hear more alarm over the spread of radioactive contamination. It seems most unlikely that Japan will ever build another reactor.
Japanese fear of the nuclear industry will certainly spread to the U.S. Approvals for future reactor construction will be difficult if not impossible to obtain here because of renewed public opposition. New “safer” reactor designs won’t calm fears about an energy source that will continue to reel from Japanese fallout for years to come.
Even more ominous in this new environment is the fact that storage pools for spent uranium rods are now recognized as a threat. Every reactor has one of these glowing pools, specifically because the world has not found a way to dispose of nuclear waste.
The political bickering which has derailed the Yucca mountain nuclear waste project in Nevada will come no closer to a solution in the current environment.
Without a doubt, the world needs a new source of clean energy. But, importantly, vast new deposits of natural gas have been discovered in the U.S. and gas prices are falling.
This raises the prospect of turning to natural gas instead of nuclear. Building a gas-fired electricity station is much quicker and cheaper than any nuclear installation. (Gas-powered stations produce electricity at less than one-tenth the cost of nuclear installations according to an estimate by Gerson Lehrman Group.)
I expect we will be hearing disturbing reports of incompetence and serious after-effects from Japan for years after the Fukushima reactors have been entombed.
No matter how good the earnings reports of uranium miners will be in years to come, stock valuations will be pummeled by negative news. Yes, the reactor construction projects already underway worldwide will likely be completed. They will consume existing supplies of uranium and a great deal of supply from future projects in emerging markets. But earnings multiples will continue to be pummeled.
I believe the developed world will eventually turn very sharply away from nuclear energy and towards cheap and abundant natural gas.
Even China has reached out to the United States for help in developing its own shale gas reserves. PetroChina has also declared its intention to acquire even more gas resources worldwide in the wake of Japan’s earthquake.
The biggest consumer of liquefied natural gas in the world is Japan. In the aftermath of the nuclear disaster it seems a certainty that gas demand will rise exponentially in Japan and the rest of the world.
The smart money will likely take a position in natural gas resources. Despite calls for a rebound in uranium stocks, I believe many investors will treat them as if they were radioactive.
Related ETFs: Market Vectors Uranium & Nuclear Energy (NYSE:NLR), PowerShares Global Nuclear Energy (NYSE:PKN), iShares S&P Global Nuclear Energy (NYSE:NUCL), Global X Uranium ETF (NYSE:URA)
Global Profits Alert (GPA) is published by Trippon Financial Research, Inc. a financial media organization with offices in the United States, Hong Kong and Mainland China. GPA is written by Jim Trippon in conjunction with George Wolff, Sunny Wang, Todd Shriber, Kelley Damiani and J. Daryl Thompson. For more information and archived issues, visit http://www.globalprofitsalert.com/
This information was brought to you by GlobalProfitsAlert.com, a publication of Trippon Financial Research, Inc. GlobalProfitsAlert.com publishes information on Investing in the China stock market and emerging markets, dividend stock and income investing, exchange traded funds (ETFs), green energy stocks, technology stocks, global market trends and other investment information. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.globalprofitsalert.com/.