Low Inflation Leaves Fed’s No Taper Door Open

inflationChris Ciovacco: In early December, we used Japan as an extreme example of why central banks are terrified of allowing their respective economies to slip into a deflationary spiral. Do the same concepts apply to the United States? They do. The federal government offers standard Treasury bonds (NYSEARCA:IEF) and Treasuries that provide some protection against inflation (TIP). The law of supply and demand tells us that when demand for TIPS is greater than the demand for standard Treasuries, investors are concerned about future inflation. Conversely, when demand for TIPS is lagging demand for standard Treasuries, investors are not too concerned about inflation eroding the value of their interest payments. The chart below shows the S&P 500 (top) and the ratio of TIP-to-IEF below it. Demand for TIPS started to drop significantly in July 2008 (left of point A). As inflation fears plummeted, it helped foreshadow the big drop in equities between points C and D. The chart below helps us understand the Fed’s concerns about possible deflation.

2013: Inflation Expectations Remain Subdued

How weak are inflation expectations in 2013? Even with the Fed conducting three separate money-printing campaigns (QE), investors are not migrating to TIPS for inflation protection, which speaks to their relatively weak expectations about future inflation.

As noted in Monday’s article, using the chart below, the Fed’s bond buying has failed to help them meet their inflation target of 2%, which aligns with the feedback from the TIP/IEF ratio.

Diminishing Returns For QE?

The Fed’s desire to taper is driven more by fears of another round of bubbles, rather than some direct tie to their dual mandate or an impressive run by the global economy. Some Fed governors believe the benefits of printing more money is questionable. But other governors remain in the QE camp. From The New York Times:

But there is no consensus inside the Fed that the benefits of the bond buying, often referred to as “quantitative easing,” are wearing off. “I don’t buy this diminishing returns thing,” James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television last month. “If you lowered the funds rate from 5 percent to 4 percent, and then you lowered it from 4 percent to 3 percent, you probably wouldn’t say that the second hundred basis points was less effective than the first 100 basis points. And I don’t think we should say that about the Q.E. program either.”

Some Puzzled By Low Inflation

It seems reasonable to believe that periods of low inflation naturally follow periods of easy credit and overconsumption (see 2003-2007). Overconsumption leads to excess capacity once the bubble pops. Excess capacity speaks to low pricing power. The concerns about the threat of the global economy slipping back into deflation are well documented. From The New York Times:

Officials are also not particularly afraid of inflation. While some Fed officials worry about the risk that buying bonds will lead to faster inflation, the Fed, if anything, is increasingly confronting the opposite problem. Several Fed officials in recent weeks have expressed puzzlement over why prices have been rising at an unusually sluggish pace.

Mellow For Yellow Metal

Typically, demand for gold rises when investors become concerned about currency debasement, which aligns with inflation and reduced purchasing power.

Pages: 1 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *