Michael Noonan: Trade potentials usually do not announce themselves. They have to be ferreted out. We have been tracking wheat for several weeks because of how developing market activity is responding at current low levels.
Charts represent the language of the markets, depicting every level of market participant, from the market movers to fundamentalists, technicians, the highly informed, and even those who have no clue what they are doing. Once a decision is made to buy or sell, it is registered permanently in chart form, and everybody gets to see the developing activity at the same time. Nothing is hidden.
There is a fine line between picking bottoms and finding low-risk trades near a bottom. The determining factor is the market itself in the “message” it sends for anyone who cares to see it. Whenever there is an unusual increase in volume, it typically comes from what we will call “Smart Money,” those who are the most informed and have the ability to move a market direction-ally.
There has been a notable pick-up in volume, of late, and we attribute it to the smart money movers. It is best seen on the charts to better relate to what it can portend. We always like to start with a weekly time frame to get an overall view of market development. It is the starting point for this analysis.
The rally which began in June of 2012 took off like a rocket from a launching pad, but it did so after a period of basing, starting from June 2011. We boxed most of that activity and labeled as a support zone. If you compare the EUM, [Ease of Upward Movement], reaching the high in 2012, to the decline into August/September of 2013, price was much more labored going down. In part, it was a result of a liquidating market, and one which
punished longs all the way down.
Not drawn on the chart, but worth mentioning as a prelude to the low scenario we are advancing, is how the downward effort shortened considerably. From the breakdown out of the TR, starting in late November, 2012, to the low in April of this year, the decline was around $1.80.
From April, price moved sideways until the end of June, when the down trend resumed, again. The distance from that breakdown to the recent low is only about $.75. Both time and price were shortened, and that alone can lead to a change in trend. Keep in mind, a change in trend can be the ending of the down trend to sideways, not necessarily a full reversal to up.
With that in mind, note the location of the low, at 1, relative to the bottom channel line. Price stopped at about a half-way retracement within that channel and then proceeded to move sideways. A few weeks later, the upper channel, resistance, was broken as price rallied above, stopping at 2.
At 1, volume increased sharply for two weeks. Compare the first high volume bar, a wider range down with a poor close, to the second high volume bar. The range was much smaller and the close was just under mid-range the bar. We know zero, about fundamentals, like crop size, weather, growing conditions, etc, but when it comes to reading a chart, that is our arena, for we know about charts, and those two weeks just gave us added information.
The reason why the second bar was smaller was because buyers were supporting the market, taking the offerings from sellers, thus preventing the price range from extending lower. You can be sure buyers were just as active in the first high volume weekly bar, but a second week was needed to absorb the effort from sellers. We know this also from the location of the close, just slightly lower from the previous week, a victory for the buy side.
Where did this battle take place? Right at the same level of established support to the left, the large box area. The little pieces of the developing activity are starting to reveal a story different from how most view the wheat market, at the time, and even currently. The rest of the developing story, at point 3, is taken up on the daily chart.
The large box in the middle is area 1 from the weekly. The rally to 7.20 in October is 2. A clustering of closes is explained on the chart, and formed at 3. It has developed right at support from the left. What is most notable is the sharp increase in volume and the total lack of downside follow-through from all that effort. This is why it makes the most sense to conclude the clustering will lead to change, rather than continuation.