Just kidding, of course.
There’s no denying though that Apple is in a jam. The ancient Greeks would have described Apple’s situation as being between Scylla and Charybdis. The myth is that in the narrow strait of Messina, sailors had to decide to pass closer to Scylla (a six-headed sea monster) or Charybdis (a whirlpool).
Apple has two unpleasant choices in its fight with the FBI, which wants Apple to unlock the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino shooters.
Apple can face calls of being unpatriotic and a possible boycott of its product in the U.S. – not to mention being on the government’s bad side. All kinds of investigations could come from that.
Or it could unlock the terrorist’s phone. That would cost it some customers who are worried about privacy. And, I believe, perhaps endanger its entire future growth.
Apple vs. Law Enforcement
The FBI says it needs access to all the data on the phone in order to have a thorough investigation. The iPhone may have data on it revealing whether others were involved, or if other attacks are planned.
But Apple’s Tim Cook says unlocking the phone would set a “dangerous precedent that would threaten everyone’s civil liberties.”
FBI Director James Comey counters by saying Apple’s stance allows terrorists and criminals to “go dark” and out of sight of law enforcement agencies.
Law enforcement agencies, through court orders, have about 10 outstanding requests in for Apple to unlock iPhones. Incredibly, these court orders are based on the All Writs Act of 1789. Gee, I didn’t know George Washington had an iPhone.
Comey says Apple’s compliance in the San Bernardino case “was not intended to set a precedent.”
But Apple says compliance will give the government access to everyone’s phone. Cook said the court order was the equivalent of the government forcing safe or lock manufacturers to go around the country opening everyone’s safes and locks.
In response, Apple is actually working on stronger iCloud backup encryption.
The Real Question
There’s one real question here. That is whether the FBI is really asking Apple to create a backdoor into iPhones, dubbed the “FBiOS” by security expert Dan Guido.
If it is, that’s a game changer for technology companies. It will forever change security, encryption and most importantly, privacy.
Yes, the good guys will have more tools for finding bad guys. But it also sets up vast official data depositories that will inevitably be accessed by bad guys.
Let’s not forget too that the Internet of Things is coming. Nasty visions of George Orwell’s “1984” keep dancing in my head. U.S. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper openly told Congress recently about turning the Internet of Things into an Internet of surveillance.
Apple in Trouble
Enough scary thoughts. Let’s get back to Apple itself.
I believe that eventually, in some way, the company will be forced to comply in the San Bernardino terrorist case.
That will open Pandora’s box. I can guarantee you nearly every government on the planet will be asking Apple (and other smartphone makers) to help in investigations. Remember, one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist.
Sooner or later China will tell Apple, “Hey, you helped your FBI investigate terrorists. Now help us investigate our ‘terrorists.’”
Apple will be in a tight spot. The Greater China region (including Taiwan and Hong Kong) is of prime importance to the company.
Just five years ago, the region accounted for less than 10% of Apple’s revenues. Now it accounts for 25% of its revenues. And based on the current growth path, the Greater China region will surpass the Americas as Apple’s largest region by 2018.
I’m sure Apple will politely tell the Chinese no. And guess what? China will likely tell Apple to take a hike. That market will be closed to the company.
Apple’s iPhone has already faced a struggle there. Chinese smartphone makers, including Xiaomi and Huawei, are real up-and-comers and will be vying for global market share in a few short years.
Now Apple could be shut out of its biggest and most lucrative market in the years ahead. Besides India, there are no more big markets left. And India, with its bureaucracy, will be a tough market to crack for Apple.
If I were an Apple shareholder, I would worry a lot about the future of the company if the FBI wins.
This article is brought to you courtesy of Tony Daltorio from Wyatt Investment Research.